there was a penn and teller bullshit episode on this once. No they can’t tell the difference. They served everyone tapwater from the same hose, but in fancy bottles, and now everyone started to have preferences.

who the fuck does he think he is to “negotiate” ceding someone else’s territory? (I’m not expecting any answers, the oompa loompa simply defies all logic)

i wouldn’t worry about it. The whole business is built on an extremely huge miscalculation.

funny how a(n implicitly) rooted linux computer is fine, but a rooted handheld linux computer is the devil and insecure.

I would support them joining. But of course no fucking tantrums will be tolerated. You will abide by the same rules as everyone else.

theoretically, they wouldn’t, and yes, that is how it works. The math says so.

opposite or not, they are both tasks that the fixed-matrix-multiplications can utterly fail at. It’s not a regulation thing. It’s a math thing: this cannot possibly work.

If you could get the checker to be correct all of the time, then you could just do that on the model it’s “checking” because it is literally the same thing, with the same failure modes, and the same lack of any real authority in anything it spits

how does that stop the checker model from “hallucinating” a “yep, this is fine” when it should have said “nah, this is wrong”

the first one was confident. But wrong. The second one could be just as confident and just as wrong.

what makes the checker models any more accurate?

just up our prices. No need to shoot ourselves in the foot. You want a 50% tarriff? I will increase the prices I sell my stuff to you by 50% too. That effectively turns their 50% into 125%. If you do this for stuff they can only get from here then they’ll quickly walk it back. Use their tarriffs against them, not do the same thing to our own citizens

I’m maltese. This year they muted the audience for our song lol.

+1

I’ve been there and it was beautiful. I happened to get there right on the day the cherry blossoms opened!

no, it’s not. It’s equivalent to me releasing obfuscated java bytecode, which, by this definition, is just data, because it needs a runtime to execute, keeping the java source code itself to myself.

Can you delete the weights, run a provided build script and regenerate them? No? then it’s not open source.

It’s just free, not open source. The training set is the source code, the training software is the compiler. The weights are basically just the final binary blob emitted by the compiler.