You misunderstand me. I got your point and have nothing against you. I just recommend to advertise sarcasm/satire more obviously.

This kind of sarcasm is unnoticeable online since ca. 2018. MAGA clowns post more extreme stuff and mean it several times a day. The “/s” is sadly necessary.

& device fingerprint & personal (google) account & a ton of metadata linked to both

lol. I get the joke. Still, I just think anyone work a working brain should be able to notice that

• the bourgeoise just follows their masters
• neither Bezos nor Musk are Jews
• that “we” are not powerful enough unless we’re billionaires

You can hate Jews, brown people, black people, gingers, trans people and others as much as you want and still recognize that.

Unless your brain isn’t working right (eg MAGA) or you are economically benefiting (eg bourgeoisie). I guess you could put that onto a 2d graph as well.

At this point the answer should be billionaires regardless of affiliation.

My brain autocorrected their mix-up of potatoes and tomatoes until I read your comment.

Definitely! Loriot would take this situation and at least double the awkwardness.

I think the majority of animals have descriptive names. However the discussion isn’t even in the vicinity of whether the names are descriptive.

First (& very common) bird I looked up seems to be the exception?

Fantail / pīwakawaka Known for its friendly ‘cheet cheet’ call and energetic flying antics, the fantail is one of the most common and widely distributed native birds on the New Zealand mainland.

“The younger generation recognizes 100+ Pokémon but almost no domestic bird. “

Yeah, most birds don’t spout their own name constantly though. Imagine a dove yelling “Dove! Dove!” while shitting on your head.

That’s not what OP wrote though.