The President of Portugal, one of the parties of the treaty of Tordesillas, ruling country of half the New World with the benediction of the pope, top sardine fisher, main exporter of Cristiano Ronaldos, and foremost port wine producer.

Linux AND meditation? Not both at the same time, surely?

You could spell it ‘DEAF TO THE IDTh’

France not in the top 25???

I am NOT HAPPY about this!!!

Aaaah OK.

not raEd1ng tHAT esay! MAGA!!!

I was asking about some context and everyone gets rabid. Super cool.

How am I supposed to know who the twitter guy is? You really research everyone you hear about on this community?

because lots of people view genocide as a serious topic…

Astounding.

It was hardly evidence. It was a quip.

Let me put it another way, I don’t converse with paedophiles so I’m going to need proof that you’ve never diddled kids before we can continue.

Here we go. Amazing and terribly clever.

Sorry I’m not an American! FFS

OK thanks for the context. The post is overly elliptic.

I get it but you could apply it to the post itself.

“Can you prove Wolf Blitzer isn’t Israel’s mouthpiece? Because somebody on the internet told me so!”

I don’t see why asking for sources is mocked.

Mmh… Somebody could hypothetically have worked for AIPAC in the past and become a staunch opponent of Israel’s policy

For me, not specifically knowing the guy in question, using the shortcut “has worked for AIPAC” -> “is a mouthpiece of Israel” isn’t a really solid argument

So, thanks for the link, this is what I missed

Fair point. Could be a quote from a relevant expert saying “I think it’s bullshit” maybe?

It’s true but I prefer my criticisms without ad hominems

Where’s the source for discrediting the statement?

Big if not true

I’m sure he speaks like Matt Berry “hello flight XY1234, be warned that you’re flying tremenDOUSly towards a huMONgous airplane. AAAAH! Please avert collision, yes?”

Missed opportunity to start a total war on the pangolins (or bats or whatever it was)

No. Homicides have still raised by 15% in 2024. This is a graph of rate increase in homicides, not of homicides. It’s the second derivative (see speed vs acceleration)

Me, a classical student of principia statisticalia and an avid disciple of reasoning: ‘hmm, yes the UK has at least 2 (two) actors, one could infer’

What else are we supposed to get from this? I might be little tired.