• 1 Post
  • 128 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 4th, 2024

help-circle




  • Humans are pretty bad at consistently rating things on a scale

    Yeah, it seems almost only professional reviewers know how to consistently quantify quality and even amongst them, it varies a lot.

    Yet in these days of social media, everyone and their mother consider their own judgment superior 😮‍💨

    I like Steam’s method of just asking whether you like it and then aggregating those into a rating

    Yeah, I couldn’t agree more! It actually works!


  • This right here is a great example of the societal cancer that is review inflation: when perfect (5 out of 5) becomes the new good enough, every review becomes an essentially useless binary.

    I’d argue that you shouldn’t ever trust a 5 star review that isn’t absolutely overflowing with specific and relevant praise, but that’s just me being stuck in the before times when they were actually useful.






  • I don’t think you being reactionary to a far-right whose not present here, or the letter writers trying to preach to the far-right from a “corrective left” perspective of professionals in the top end of town works.

    Good thing that none of that is happening, then.

    It’s hot air

    Back to the self-description, I see.

    The far-right aren’t going to read the edicts past down from on high and see the error of their ways

    Public figures tend to react to media pressure and other public figures taking a public stand tends to create such pressure. This is politics 101 stuff.

    It’s a totally pipe dream leftism that assumes “being a scold” does anything but push people right.

    So what do you suggest, then? Never speaking up about harmful lies and the suffering they cause? Because that’s DEFINITELY not going to convince anyone.

    I mean take yourself - you couldn’t even handle my original comment pointing that out.

    Again with the ridiculous strawmen. You were wrong and I pointed it out. The only one unable to “handle” anything seems to be yourself.

    Look at all the time we’ve wasted here just because you had an “I’ve detected prejudice” error.

    Again, not the case. It doesn’t say anything good about your point that you need to keep insisting on two or three strawmen to make it.

    This is just all the stuff the left gets wrong, that feeds into the far-right populism. We need an alternative ti being scolds

    Yeah, right. Telling them that they’re harming people forces them to double down because that’s how interpersonal communication works 🙄

    You’re invoking this comic in spite of pretending to be a leftist yourself:



  • Your studies demonstrate the fact that immigrants are much more likely to be the VICTIMS of sexual violence than native born people

    No one said otherwise! Sorry, what’s your argument? That it doesn’t count as rape if immigrant men rape immigrant women? That’s disgusting dude.

    No, that’s asinine. My point is that the anti-immigant rhetoric has nothing to do with protecting immigrants from being raped and everything to do with falsely portraying immigrant men as inherently likely to commit rape.

    No asshole, of course that still counts as rape

    I didn’t say or even imply anything to the contrary. You can pack away your weird strawman now.

    Of course that’s part of the higher amounts of SA and SV in those communities.

    Immigrant women being victims ≠ immigrant men being the perpetrators. To imply that immigration leads to rape is like implying that black people existing leads to killer cops.

    I don’t know why you needed to be shown studies to admit that

    I didn’t. In fact, I never suggested otherwise, see above.

    Of course leftist elites aren’t going to recognize that, and are going to try to pretend it’s not true - like you were doing.

    Again, that’s not what’s happening here.

    The “leftist elites" are objecting to demagogues exploiting the very real problem of sexual violence against women (of which none of them nor I have denied that immigrant women are disproportionately the victims) as a way to further demonize and persecute immigrants.

    I take it you’re no longer claiming it’s “just prejudice” to point this stuff out

    Prejudice, conflating victims and perpetrators, or both. Take your pick.

    That you see a problem with not addressing increased rape stats now

    Nobody’s arguing for doing that.

    not addressing and contextualizing gives the far right something to gripe about?

    That’s the POINT: the far right are putting it in a false context for their own disinformation campaigns and you’re doing something similar for different reasons.

    Meanwhile, the “leftist elites” are simply saying that demonizing and scapegoating immigrants doesn’t help any victims and is MUCH more likely to cause MORE immigrants to be assaulted by native born people who are taught to dehumanize them.

    I’m so sick of leftwingers denying problems.

    Saying that the fascists are blaming the wrong people is not denying that there are problems.

    It’s a politics of willful blindness and denialism

    Nobody’s denying anything. At least none of the people you’re accusing of it are.



  • Now you’re playing rehortorical games rather than responding with an argument.

    That’s rich coming from someone who’s literally spewing xenophobic and politically tribal stereotypes about “good neighborhoods” and “left wing elites” in response to a simple objection to racist demagoguery.

    Your studies demonstrate the fact that immigrants are much more likely to be the VICTIMS of sexual violence than native born people, which does NOT justify the “immigrants are coming to rape our women” hate speech that the women in the article are objecting to.