one of the organizations you list does not involve her and the other has her name and writes checks.

Do you know how organizing actually works or are you just looking to get angry at me because I want effective activism instead of more performative activism?

Im not sure it has the same value or impact but then again Im not literate at that level in any language that Shakespeare would be translated into as I have a child’s grasp on Spanish.

Yes I have, what is the name of the organization she works for and/or started? Where can I find the network she created with others?

Im not going to wait for an answer because there isn’t one. The organization is being done by regular people and groups that already existed, not social media celebrities.

Most people who have a fairly solid grasp of English literature would agree he is/was important. He introduces a lot of words into the language and plays and poetry before and after him show noteworthy differences.

Saying Shakespeare wasn’t important to English would be like saying Beethoven wasn’t important to classical music. It would be a hot take and would likely not be well supported.

Note there is a difference between important and writers I enjoy.

Agreed that we dont know what he looks like or why that would be important.

It’s like Occupy Wall St it is performative activism. It isn’t effective avtivism.

Also his writing more or less sucks.

That’s a skill issue.

Sonic appeals to kids in a way that Elizabethan English tends not to.

He is one of the most important writers in the English language.

I knew what he used to look like but that was 20 years ago.

Sonic appears in many languages and appeals to children. Most kids dont understand Shakespeare

Sonic appears in multiple languages. Shakespeare only wrote in English.

And that’s kind of my point. She’s great at getting attention for her but isn’t getting things done. She’s a celebrity-activist

Should we use successes as a measure of effectiveness or renown? You are suggesting renown right now.

The fact is celebrities aren’t going to fix this problem good old fashioned organizing is and she isn’t doing that. Other people are organizing and she is contributing celebrity.

No, Im holding her up to those standards. The Civil Rights Movement actually mobilized people to the point where the state cracked down on it. She’s more like Occupy Wall St in that it is more performative and has less organization on the ground.

Really, what is the name of her organization? Why haven’t they been able to organize millions like MLK did in a way that is effective and actually something that happened?

You can be a fanchild of her if you want but claiming she organized more people than MLK is simply not factually accurate.

He organized a movement of millions that got results. This lack of organizing is why we haven’t seen the successes of the civil rights movement on most issues other than LGBT marriage.

Its sad that people are so into performative actions that they forget about results,

Which is irrelevant to the USSR being an example of a non-capitalist nation that was a major driver in climate change

Is everyone here this fucking conspiratorial and this much of a follower? Im asking this because despite everyone claiming she is important Im not seeing anything to base that on other than social media fame. The only example of anything was yours and it is weak at best.

I read it. That’s why I asked. There isn’t much there

Except she didn’t really do that. We already knew about climate change and we have not dine anything more about it as a result of her work.

Would you praise a player that misses every single shot they take? At some point do results matter?