notice the article mentions absolutely NOTHING about rape, and why it should be considered as such. it was ONLY in the headline!

From the article:

Application of the new sexual criminal law

The new sexual criminal law was applied at the trial. This law, which came into force a year ago, is based on the formula “No means no”. Rape is now deemed to have occurred if the victim shows through words or gestures that they do not consent. A state of shock on the part of the victim is sufficient as a sign of refusal.

According to the Tages-Anzeiger, the 15-year-old’s state of shock was emphasized in the indictment. She was unable to defend herself against the acts and endured the assault without saying a word or moving. Before the law was changed, rape would only have been recognized if the perpetrator had used violence or threatened the victim.

Stop defending your proven mistake already and just admit that you did not read and learn to improve and not do it again.

i originally written a comment referencing different sources, but to keep it simple and to not waste time.

Here is a quote from the Daily Mail:

It comes after the National Council of Switzerland and the Council of States agreed on the formula ‘no means no’.

The amendment came into effect a year ago and means rape is now considered to have occurred if the victim indicates through words or gestures that they do not consent to the sexual act.

Before the amendment, rape only occurred if the perpetrator threatened the victim or used violence.

Furthermore, the crime of rape no longer encompasses only forced sexual intercourse with a woman, but now also includes acts similar to sexual intercourse involving physical penetration.

Are you sure they are shouting “No” and not “नहीं” ?

In all seriousness, would there be any reason that would make this news significant, aka newsworthy?

I am asking because without reading the article it seems like the only interested people would be Indians.

Am I wrong here?

Don’t pretend . You know what it mean

Care to spill it out clearly?

Google is one of main donors of Linux and KDE.

What is your point?

End occupation and let punish war criminals from both side

Sure?

Your arguments are so deep and detailed…

The first official acknowledgment by the UN of the use of sexual violence during the attacks came some five months after October 7. Then, following a mission to Israel, the UN’s Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict Pramila Patten published a report concluding there were reasonable grounds to believe conflict-related sexual violence occurred in multiple locations, and that there was clear and convincing evidence that hostages in Gaza were subjected to sexual assaults.

These testimonies, coupled with forensic reports and photographs and videos from the attacks, led them to conclude that Hamas used sexual violence in a widespread, systematic and “tactical” way as a “weapon of war.”