Running a concept to its extreme just to try and dismiss it to sound smart is an entire damn logical fallacy. Why are you insisting on using fallacies that brainless morons use?
Have you never heard of a straw man fallacy? That’s you. That’s what you’re doing.
It’s explicitly and literally not the same thing.
I bought an LG washer and drier set over 25 years ago. They’ve been around.
They were totally fine and lasted well over a decade with only one problem on the washer that I fixed.
The other person’s problem is they bought a combo unit. Few things that are nearly opposite purposes go well mixed together. Especially when entire critical components of one of them is entirely missing, like a lint filter…
Nope. You’re both correct and you are the one who fails to understand that not everything is an either-or situation.
Especially when both of your points are merely related and not in direct opposition. Old appliances were more generic and more robust, but only an idiot with survivorship bias would say all old appliances were bullet proof.
What tools do you think capitalism is going to use to fuck us harder and faster than ever before?
lol just purely wrong on that one. Hilarious.
One user vs a public service is apples to oranges and it’s actually hilarious you’re so willing to compare them.
Well you asked for six tits but you’re getting five. Why? Because the AI is intelligent and can count, obviously.
It’s both. Also don’t let the house, supreme court, or the orange buffoon and his cabinet get out of culpability. Checks and balances can work … when they all aren’t bought and paid for by rich fucks.
Definitely both.
No, they clearly did take the company’s side, and no, that does not open them up to a legal claim. That case would get dismissed so damn fast it’s not even funny.
Nope. Nowhere did I say they shouldn’t use ANY Mexican symbol.
What I did say, is it would be much more powerful imagery to convince conservatives it’s wrong, if the cops are seen cracking down on someone waving a US flag.
Please, PLEASE stop being a reactionary and understand how messaging and subtext works.
Who said whitewashing was what I was asking for? I only mentioned the Mexican flag. Your understanding of optics seems to be rather jouvenile and black and white…
Yes, I accounted for that, you ignorant fool… Try using reading comprehension this time:
Do you think Fox News is going to clarify that some brown guy waving a Mexican flag is actually a legal temp worker, or even US citizen? You seem to be completely and utterly ignorant as to how propaganda works…
Most people are idiots that will not pick through the BS. THAT is why you must avoid bad optics, because the VAST majority of people who don’t ALREADY agree with you will use every assumption given to them to continue disagreeing with you.
Are they wrong? Yes. Do they think they are wrong? Hell no! Only a fool like you would continue to feed their assinine assumptions.
Yes, they do their part to help Republicans Waltz the US ever rightward.
“Not that it’s entirely applicable in this case…”
“not that it’s entirely applicable to this case…”
Also, you’d have to be silly to deny “queen” isn’t also a royal title, no matter how little respect female rulers have gotten throughout history. The problem is the class of people, and “queen” is absolutely part of it.
Exactly, and a shotgun with birdshot is not going to convince it that you are a mortal threat. Using one against a bear that maybe wasn’t going to eat you might just convince it that you need to be dead anyways.
Note: This is in the context where the bear returns with them on land following its tracks, not with them on the boat. Scaring it from the boat was still the right call.
I’ve seen several videos on it and most said he did. Not at first. Later, when he was near comatose.
Still dodging any actual point. Have fun being too stupid to actually engage with a discussion. Genuinely pitiful of you.