You would have been terrified? If you’re that scared of brown people, that’s your own issue.

Context should make it pretty easy. I’d probably guess it’s more pro-demon.

3+2+2 = 7

Resident Evil 7: Biohazard

That’s exactly what I’d expect a climate change denier to say!

the search model is helpful to is all

You answered your own question. The search engine indexes your page to send traffic to you. The AI bot indexes your page to plagiarize your content.

Anecdotally, AI also routinely ignores sites’ robots.txt and spoof their agents to try to hide what they’re doing. A lot of site owners are complaining about the costs of delivering content to web scrapers. Where search indexes might hit a site every day, some AI bots are running every hour and just wasting their bandwidth.

It’s on the FB post that is cut off here. The uncensored version is floating around BlackSky.

Edit: I missed that this isn’t the FB post. Someone took their picture from FB and reposted. But this is on BlackSky with the ladies names and a couple hashtags, one of which is “#BurntToACrisp”.

Kudos for cutting out their names but I do love that they included “#BurntToACrisp”

This doesn’t make sense when it’s Americans using China’s pollution to justify not scaling back our pollution.

Lol. Homophobes are funny. Thanks for the explanation.

I don’t think the reason is obvious at all. Is it because coal mining is hard work?

People often want things that are against policy. Just as the first example that comes to mind, think about a bartender giving a regular patron a long pour or a free drink. That’s good for tips, but bad for the restaurant. That’s not always the case, but a good waiter can usually bend or break the rules to keep a guest happy.

Former tipped employee here. This is probably correct, but I don’t care. The majority is often wrong. They can be educated. Change is scary, and the people who benefit from the status quo demonize changes that will give them less power.

I would probably have made less money if paid a salary, but it would be worth it to not have to balance priorities between getting a good tip and following restaurant policies.

There are good criticisms of other economic systems that have been tried, but capitalism really seems designed to transfer the most power and resources to the greediest and least ethical.

If the large majority doesn’t tip, wait staff will become homeless. That’s the only “message” you’re sending. Restaurant owners won’t care in the slightest.

Don’t patronize organizations that don’t pay their employees. This is the message, you’re claiming you want to send. You have to take money away from the people who set the policy, not the worker who has to live under the policy. Find restaurants that refuse tips and spend your money there. (Or just don’t go out.)

Until we end tipping, tip your servers.

You think ethnic cleansing is new? They’re literally talking about how this is very similar to what the Nazis did.

The times are quite precedented. We are looking unfortunately similar to Germany in the lead up to WWII.

I just want to point out what you’re saying now directly contradicts the original comment I replied to.

I don’t think we disagree very much. My point was and still is that divisions in the left come from policy disputes, not the nonsense that the base comment still hasn’t supported.

It seems terribly dismissive to frame these as a result of right wing (or other) agitation. There are significant differences between people who want to throw trans people under the bus and those who don’t, etc.

Sure, it must be nice for the right to be able to rally around whatever false talking points they gin up for the day. But when you have people who care about the truth, they will disagree sometimes.

deleted by creator

I’m not sure I understand you. Can you give an example of a conservative making a comment that pits one minority against the other that took the left out for a week?

Everyone uses this cliche. Nobody seems to understand it.

a bad or reckless manager can put the company at significant risk

Yes. In this circumstance, the manager opened the company up to a lawsuit with his comments. It would have protected the company to punish him or have him take some sort of class.

You can just say that HR is usually bad at their jobs. “Protecting the company not the employee” is completely meaningless here.

Maybe the person I replied to will read it this time.