• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    in case there are others like me who have to see what it looks like on a Mercator projection map:

    • x0x7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Wow. I can’t believe my perspective of the world is that distorted. It makes me want to only look at it in 3D. If we’ve all mainly looked at Mercator projections our whole lives our sense of where everything is relative to everything else and what direction is completely off.

      People complain about the proportional sizing of Mercator but the sense of direction it gives us is completely broken. I think the average person knows it’s off and people think there is an error factor to consider that a really straight like might be a little squiggly. But nope. This made me realize the Mercator gives pretty much zero accurate sense of direction if real distance is involved.

      • Morlark@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        People complain about the proportional sizing of Mercator but the sense of direction it gives us is completely broken.

        With respect, this is silly. People complain about the proportional sizing of the Mercator projection because disproportionate sizing is literally the only problem with the Mercator projection.

        The sense of direction being off has got literally nothing to do with Mercator. That’s an inherent drawback of trying to project a three dimensional globe onto a 2D image. Literally every single projection has this exact problem, in one form or another. It is considered ot be an acceptable trade-off for not having to work with globes all the time.

        Stop looking for yet more baseless reasons to bash the Mercator projection, which is a perfectly reasonable and acceptable projection to use within its intended usecase (which this specific example literally is).

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Short distances are fine, and obviously directly east/west are fine. Directly north/south is also pretty alright, but, as you move further from the equator, any east or west movement is covering less distance, and vice versa.

        • x0x7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Right. That is the size issue. I’m saying there is a substantial direction issue as well.