But they already lost the advantage they had. The point of the retaliatory tariffs are not to make money, but to send a message.

They’ve already sent a message that they can tolerate Trump’s bullshit as long as it doesn’t hurt them too much when they backed down on the digital service tax.

Bringing it back now is a lot less effective than implementing it the first time around while still hurting Canadians the same amount.

What is your point in the first place, anyway? That you know better than an active officer just because?

He probably was thinking of the mean instead of the median. Just a typical brain fart.

Which country are you looking at for those statistics?

That’s not a source.

And yet the student protesters are being run over despite your claim that only armed rioters are burning cops alive. The exact same reasoning Zionists use to justify killing Palestinians. Like I said, you think exactly like a Zionist, which is funny.

So because the US media justifies the killing of Palestinians, China is justified in killing student protesters, is that what you want to say?

Also, you seem to be arguing that since some demonstrators are acting violent, shooting at, running over and oppressing student protesters are also justified? That sounds like the same logic Zionists use to justify killing Palestinians because some of them might be Hamas. You seem to agree with Zionists quite a lot.

The projection is real.

So, if you have poop on your hands, would you eat with that hand after only using toilet paper to wipe it off?

Then, you can do the same with a bidet. After rinsing it with water, use soap, then rinse it again.

Well, I don’t, I just use paper towels/tissues. We don’t even have towels for hand drying in bathrooms where I’m from.

Why would you want to dry your hand using a towel that is hanging 24/7 in air filled with poop particles in the first place? A bidet being there or not doesn’t change that.

You shouldn’t be questioning him. He’s not the one making the law.

Why are you wiping your wet ass with toilet paper the same way you wipe your poop encrusted ass? Its already clean. Just dab your ass with toilet paper and you won’t leave bits of toilet paper in them.

How is leaving your ass crusted in poo less disgusting than wiping your ass after cleaning it with water? Do you not wipe your ass after a shower? If you do, that’s just another ass towel that you also use to wipe your whole body. If you don’t, that means you don’t actually care about having swampy ass in the first place.

Nah, you’re just selectively looking at evidence without nuance or understanding of what they actually show, just like people who spout statistics to call black people violent. There’s a reason analysis is required to turn data into accurate conclusions, not just looking at it at face value like you are doing. What’s funny is you’re even using the exact same argument as them when called out.

If you actually understood your own conclusion, you would actually debunk every argument I made for why I don’t think your evidence supports your conclusion. Instead, you did this and proven to me the opposite.

Where did they mention race in the part of the comment you quoted?

When you judge people using labels and ignore every nuance, you’re the cause of the miscommunication, not the use of a label that has an actual meaning outside of your seemingly very judgemental understanding.

World News is not Lemmy, and looking at posts doesn’t determine the population make-up of Lemmy users. Neither does posts about White News, whatever that means, determine the race of then poster.

I don’t see you denying looking at people from third world country as less than human. I guess I was right, then?

Also, if I wouldn’t be such a wanker buying from China, problem solved? What is this sentence structure even supposed to convey? It seems lack of education goes along well with your superiority complex.

So you yawn when people in Xinjiang died making your solar panels? It seems you don’t treat people in third world countries as fellow humans, for some reason.