No, rather, a new solution must be found. Because the demographic pyramids have been inverted, which has made pensions a problem for government finances.
We have time to maneuver, but if this isn’t resolved, we’ll reach the point where we’ll prioritize the Capable and leave the Incapable to chance.
Originally, pensions were only meant to provide incentives, because many people didn’t reach that age. Now that there are so many older retirees, it’s becoming a burden that, if not addressed, will be catastrophic for the government.
But they should reduce pensions because it only benefits older people who could be used for more research, defense and infrastructure.
If income increases, but you don’t manage it well, the problem won’t be solved.
In my opinion, the government shouldn’t be offering services left and right, just what’s necessary.
If people want freedom, that’s fine, but the government isn’t going to take on many responsibilities.
If people want comfort, that’s fine, but they should follow the rules the government imposes.
Do you want France to have tax agents as effective as the IRS?
In reality, Russia is going to attack with scrap metal and use its entire population as cannon fodder to claim they have committed “genocide.”
They are more corrupt.
Why does Japan want to further tighten already difficult immigration measures?